Research Radartracking 209 published studies Β· 52 human Β· 18 clinical trials Β· 25 cancer pages Β· updated Jun 2026Open the Research Map β†’

Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Auto-discovered from research; not yet curated.

Auto-added Β· review pending
Educational only: This page is not medical advice. Coordinate decisions with your oncology team.

OncoForge editorial Β· How we review β†’

AI extractedhuman reviewedsources checkedretractions suppressed

Evidence at a glanceHuman · observationalMixed results⚠ Studies disagree
4 published studies that name Uterine Serous Carcinoma2 human studies approved & graded (trial, observational, or meta-analysis)31 human clinical studies in the Uterine Serous Carcinoma corpus327 source documents in the Uterine Serous Carcinoma corpus
Why this grade?

Human Β· observational β€” Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Computed deterministically from the studies’ types and reported outcomes β€” not written by AI, and not a claim that anything works.

What the guidelines say

NCI PDQESMONCCNASCO

We link the authoritative guidelines rather than reproduce them. Below, the treatments on this page are split into standard care, guideline or regulatory options, supportive care, and studied but not standard so established care is not mixed with experimental or supportive items.

Studied, not standard - investigational
  • Trastuzumab Deruxtecan
  • Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)

Read the guidelines

Cancer-specific deep links aren’t curated yet β€” these search the authoritative sources for Uterine Serous Carcinoma.

Treatment map: Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Open as a full page β†’

Standard care plus every compound studied in the literature (each cited) and graded by evidence, organized by clinical readiness. A category, not a verdict that anything works β€” confirm anything here with your oncology team.

2
Interventions
0
Standard of care
2
Tested in people
0
Lab / animal
0
Named in lit.
1
Classes
Standard of care (0) Guideline option (0) Tested in people (2) Lab / animal only (0) Named in the literature (0)

Tested in people, by trial phase: phase not reported Γ—2

Investigational & adjunct compounds β€” detail (2)

"Tested in people" rows show the highest trial phase found in that compound's cited human studies (Phase I–IV; "phase not reported" = a human study with no phase tag). "Studied" = named in the cited literature for this cancer. "FDA βœ“" = FDA-approved for this cancer; "off-label" = an FDA-approved drug used outside its approved indications (per openFDA). Not a claim that anything works.

Reported figures

Get cited updates on Uterine Serous Carcinoma
A monthly email when the research changes β€” $10/mo. Manage follows
Follow Uterine Serous Carcinoma

What supports this page

The kinds of sources behind this page, strongest at the top. Faint rungs show what is not here yet.

Guideline
3
Meta-analysis
5
Systematic review
1
Randomized trial
2
Clinical trial
38
Observational
0
Case report
38
Review
238
Preclinical
0
Other
2

Living document β€” last change June 16, 2026: New cancer type added.

Overview

Uterine Serous Carcinoma is tracked here from the published studies that mention it. This page shows the research evidence collected so far β€” it is not a curated clinical overview.

Medicines & supplements studied for Uterine Serous Carcinoma

PubMedFDAClinicalTrials.gov

Every drug, supplement, and other agent the published studies cover for Uterine Serous Carcinoma, ranked by how strong the evidence is β€” what studies report, not a recommendation. Tap any to see its full profile.

Medicines Β· 2

Trastuzumab DeruxtecanHuman Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 PMID 39639215 Β· effect sizes 1–5 across 3 studies

Most authoritative study: Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

Based on a single study.
Targeted therapyFDA off-label1 studyFull profile β†’
Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)Human Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 PMID 39639215 Β· effect sizes 1–5 across 3 studies

Most authoritative study: Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

Based on a single study.
Targeted therapy1 studyFull profile β†’

What recent studies report in Uterine Serous Carcinoma

These are reviewed studies whose abstracts concern Uterine Serous Carcinoma. Each describes only what that study reported. This is not a claim by OncoForge that any compound helps or harms Uterine Serous Carcinoma. Most are early lab, animal, or small human studies, and findings often conflict.

4 studies2 human⚠ Conflicting evidenceMechanism (3)

Tracking 4 published studies of Uterine Serous Carcinoma: 2 in humans, 2 reviews/other.

Reported direction across studies: 2 positive, 2 mixed.

Findings conflict β€” both supportive and negative/mixed results exist (see below). Human evidence is limited.

These counts summarize what the studies reported; they are not a measure of whether anything works for Uterine Serous Carcinoma.

Compounds with studies mentioning Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Trastuzumab deruxtecan t dxd (1)Trastuzumab deruxtecan (1)
ReviewMechanismMixed resultsModerate evidenceTier 4 Β· clinical

Updates and controversies in the management of uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society Β· Mar 2025 Β· Review

uterine serous carcinomauterine carcinosarcoma

This is a narrative review summarizing recent evidence on molecular classification, biomarkers, and new treatment approaches for uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma. The authors highlight biomarkers such as HER2, TP53, and mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability, discuss circulating tumor DNA and precision-based treatment options, and note survival disparities for non-Hispanic Black and other underserved minority patients. They conclude that continuing to prioritize biomarker-driven therapies and developing novel treatments through clinical trials β€” integrated with surgery and cytotoxic chemotherapy β€” is necessary.

Reported effects: proportion_of_cases 15% Β· proportion_of_deaths 50%

Key findings
  • Uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma are rare but account for a disproportionate share of endometrial cancer deaths.
  • These subtypes have a high likelihood of metastasis and multisite recurrence and are biologically distinct from other endometrial cancers.
  • The review analyzes the role of biomarkers including HER2, TP53, and mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability and their influence on treatment strategies and surveillance.
  • Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is discussed as a potential tool.
  • Novel precision-based treatment options are described and the authors call for continued development of biomarker-driven therapies through clinical trials.
  • Disparate survival outcomes for non-Hispanic Black and other underserved minority patients are identified, and strategies to improve their outcomes are discussed.
Limitations: Narrative review rather than primary research; no new experimental or trial data presented in the abstract.; Abstract provides no methods, search strategy, or inclusion criteria (potential selection bias).; Rare tumor subtypes mean available evidence is likely limited and heterogeneous (implicit limitation).; No quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) or new clinical outcome data reported in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

Human Β· observationalReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 10

Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

BMC cancer Β· Dec 2024 Β· retrospective cohort

Trastuzumab-deruxtecan-t-dxdTrastuzumab-deruxtecanendometrial neoplasmsovarian neoplasmscervical neoplasmsuterine carcinosarcomauterine leiomyosarcomauterine serous carcinomaovarian carcinosarcomahigh-grade serous ovarian carcinomamucinous ovarian carcinomasquamous cervical carcinoma

This retrospective single-center study identified 10 patients with HER2-expressing (IHC 2+/3+) recurrent or metastatic gynecological cancers who received trastuzumab deruxtecan (5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks). The cohort had a median progression-free survival of 5.4 months (95% CI 0.8-9.8). Five patients had a partial response, one had stable disease at 12 weeks, and four had disease progression at initial assessment. Clinical benefit was observed mainly in tumors with HER2 IHC 3+.

Reported effects: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 Β· partial responses 5, n=10 Β· +2 more

Key findings
  • 10 patients with recurrent/metastatic HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies were treated with T-DXd.
  • Histologies included uterine neoplasms (n=5), cervical squamous carcinoma (n=1) and ovarian cancers (n=4).
  • Median age was 65.4 years (25th-75th percentile, 58.1-75.2 years).
  • HER2 by IHC: 5 patients were 3+ and 5 patients were 2+.
  • Median number of prior therapy lines was 4 (range 2-6); 2 uterine serous carcinoma patients were pretreated with trastuzumab and 4 patients had prior immunotherapy.
  • Dose: T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks until progression/toxicity.
  • Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the cohort was 5.4 months (95% CI 0.8-9.8 months).
  • Responses: 5 patients had partial response (including 2 previously treated with trastuzumab), 1 patient had stable disease at 12 weeks, 4 patients had disease progression at initial assessment.
  • Most patients who derived clinical benefit had HER2 IHC 3+ expression.
Limitations: Retrospective, single-center design; Very small sample size (n=10); No control or comparator arm; Heterogeneous mix of gynecologic histologies; Heavily pre-treated population limits generalizability; Limited/absent reporting of safety or adverse event data in the abstract; Potential selection and reporting bias inherent to retrospective series.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

ReviewMechanismReported positiveLimited evidenceTier 3 Β· early human

Aging and uterine serous carcinoma

Histology and histopathology Β· Nov 2018 Β· Review

uterine serous carcinomaendometrial cancerendometrial neoplasms

This is a narrative review linking advanced age to uterine serous carcinoma (USC). The authors summarize evidence that the p53 signature (p53S) is an early indicator of USC and is almost always found in elderly women; they suggest p53S may drive an age-related imbalance between proliferation and apoptosis of endometrial epithelial cells and propose an age-related type of endometrial cancer distinct from the traditional Type II classification.

Key findings
  • Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is closely associated with advanced age.
  • The p53 signature (p53S) is considered the earliest indication for carcinogenesis of USC.
  • p53 signatures have almost always been found in elderly women.
  • p53 signatures are suspected to be responsible for an imbalance between proliferation and apoptosis of endometrial epithelial cells with advanced age.
  • Authors propose an age-related type of endometrial cancer instead of the conventional Type II estrogen-independent classification.
Limitations: Narrative review with no new primary data presented in the abstract.; No sample sizes, methods, or systematic review methodology reported in the abstract.; Causal role of p53 signatures is described as 'suspected' and therefore remains speculative based on the abstract.; Proposal of a new age-related classification is not supported by new evidence within the abstract..

Discusses molecular/biomarker (p53) links between aging and uterine serous carcinoma and proposes a classification based on age.

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed

Human Β· observationalMechanismMixed resultsModerate evidenceTier 3 Β· early humann = 373

Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma

Nature Β· May 2013 Β· Integrated genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic characterization

endometrial carcinomauterine serous carcinomaendometrioid tumourovarian serous carcinomabasal-like breast carcinoma

The authors performed integrated genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of 373 endometrial carcinomas. They identified four molecular subtypes (POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy-number low, and copy-number high) with distinct mutation and copy-number profiles. Uterine serous and about 25% of high-grade endometrioid tumors had many copy-number alterations and frequent TP53 mutations, while most endometrioid tumors had frequent PTEN, CTNNB1, PIK3CA, ARID1A and KRAS mutations and novel ARID5B alterations. The authors note that this genomic classification may affect post-surgical adjuvant treatment decisions for women with aggressive tumors.

Reported effects: sample_size 373, n=373 Β· proportion_high-grade_endometrioid_with_extensive_copy_number_alterations 25% Β· +1 more

Key findings
  • Integrated analysis of 373 endometrial carcinomas was performed using array- and sequencing-based technologies.
  • Uterine serous tumours and ∼25% of high-grade endometrioid tumours had extensive copy number alterations, few DNA methylation changes, low estrogen/progesterone receptor levels, and frequent TP53 mutations.
  • Most endometrioid tumours had few copy number alterations or TP53 mutations, but frequent mutations in PTEN, CTNNB1, PIK3CA, ARID1A and KRAS and novel mutations in ARID5B.
  • A subset of endometrioid tumours had a markedly increased transversion mutation frequency and newly identified hotspot mutations in POLE.
  • Endometrial cancers were classified into four categories: POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy-number low, and copy-number high.
  • Uterine serous carcinomas share genomic features with ovarian serous and basal-like breast carcinomas.
Limitations: Observational genomic characterization of tumor samples without interventional or longitudinal clinical trial data.; No clinical outcome or treatment-response data reported in the abstract to validate proposed treatment implications.; Functional consequences of newly identified mutations (e.g., ARID5B, POLE hotspots) are not demonstrated in this report.; Cohort is limited to 373 tumors; subgroup counts and generalizability to all patient populations are not detailed in the abstract..

AI summary of the abstract, human-reviewed Β· Jun 2026. Describes what this study reported, not medical advice. View on PubMed Β· Full text

Browse all studies mentioning Uterine Serous Carcinoma β†’

Where the evidence is

What has been studied, and how strong it is, by topic. A dashed cell means no studies were found for that combination β€” a gap, not evidence of no effect. Open a row to see its studies.

CompoundHuman evidenceMechanismSafetyTrial
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan1β€”β€”β€”
Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)1β€”β€”β€”

Study mix

4 published studies by what they were done in. Lab and animal findings often do not carry over to people.

2 Human2 Review/other
Reported directionReported positive2Mixed results2

Compounds with reported-positive results in Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Where at least one study reported a positive result, shown with the full picture, not just the wins. Positive results are more likely to be published, and most of these are early lab or animal studies that may not translate to people. This reports what studies found, not what works.

Human evidence

Limitations: Retrospective, single-center design; Very small sample size (n=10); No control or comparator arm; Heterogeneous mix of gynecologic histologies; Heavily pre-treated population limits generalizability; Limited/absent reporting of safety or adverse event data in the abstract.
Cited positive studies (1)
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan1 positive1 human
Limitations: Retrospective, single-center design; Very small sample size (n=10); No control or comparator arm; Heterogeneous mix of gynecologic histologies; Heavily pre-treated population limits generalizability; Limited/absent reporting of safety or adverse event data in the abstract.
Cited positive studies (1)

Evidence at a glance: compounds studied in Uterine Serous Carcinoma

A deterministic grade of what published studies report for each: strength of evidence, the reported direction, and the largest credible effect, strongest-evidence first. This summarizes findings; it is not a claim that anything works.

Trastuzumab DeruxtecanHuman Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 PMID 39639215 Β· effect sizes 1–5 across 3 studies

Most authoritative study: Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

Based on a single study.
Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-Dxd)Human Β· observationalReported positive1 human

Human observational evidence only β€” no trials.

Largest credible effect: median PFS 5.4 mo [0.8–9.8], n=10 PMID 39639215 Β· effect sizes 1–5 across 3 studies

Most authoritative study: Real-world evidence of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Efficacy in HER2-expressing gynecological malignancies

Based on a single study.

Clinical trials in Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Loading current trials from ClinicalTrials.gov… Search ClinicalTrials.gov β†’

Getting care & support

Nonprofit / Gov

Practical, vetted help for Uterine Serous Carcinoma β€” advocacy, paying for treatment, second opinions, and caregivers.

If you’re struggling emotionally, you don’t have to wait.

Advocacy & community

No dedicated organization for this specific cancer is curated yet β€” these general organizations can help in the meantime.

Financial help

  • PAN Foundation β†— β€” Copay assistance funds by diagnosis (funds open and close as money allows). Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
  • HealthWell Foundation β†— β€” Copay and premium assistance funds by disease. Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
  • CancerCare β€” financial assistance β†— β€” Limited grants plus free financial counseling. Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
  • Family Reach β†— β€” Help with everyday living costs (rent, transport, food) during treatment. Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
  • NeedyMeds β†— β€” Searchable directory of drug patient-assistance and discount programs. Β· status changes often β€” check the fund’s site
What you’ll typically need to apply
  • Your diagnosis and, if you have it, the specific drug/treatment name (from your care team).
  • Insurance details β€” your member ID card, or a note that you're uninsured (some funds require active insurance, some don't).
  • Proof of income and household size (recent pay stubs, a tax return, or a benefits letter) β€” most funds are income-based.
  • Your prescriber's contact information; some programs need the clinic to submit part of the application.
  • Apply early and re-check: funds open and close as money is available, so a closed fund may reopen.

General guidance β€” each program sets its own eligibility. Confirm requirements on the program’s site.

Help paying for the medicines on this page

Second opinions

Caregiver support

We list only non-profit and government resources β€” never product sellers β€” and take no affiliate fees. If a link is broken or a resource doesn't meet that bar, tell us.

Heading to an appointment? Get a printable one-page summary β€” studied compounds, open trials, interactions, and questions to ask.
Bring this to your appointment β†’